The Death of Manual Treasury Work

Treasury has always been about two things: control and confidence.
Control over cash movements. Confidence in reported numbers.

But the way most mid-market finance teams still run treasury today - manual reconciliations, endless spreadsheets, logging into half a dozen bank portals - isn’t delivering either.

The truth is, controllers and finance managers are spending the majority of their time maintaining fragile processes that were never designed for today’s operating environment.

The Fragility of Manual Treasury

Every practitioner knows reconciliation is the bedrock of treasury control. Without it, you don’t know your real position, and the downstream risks cascade - from inaccurate board reporting to failed audits.

Everyone agrees that reconciliation is a non-negotiable discipline. Yet the way most teams do it - Excel exports from multiple banks, manual tagging, copy-paste across entities - has turned a discipline into a liability.

One weak formula, one fat-fingered entry, one missed intercompany transfer - and suddenly leadership is making liquidity decisions on bad data. In volatile markets, that’s not just inefficient. It’s reckless.

The Cost No One Sees

Here’s the irony: treasury leaders know visibility is their mandate, yet their own processes guarantee opacity.

• Cross-entity reconciliations take days instead of minutes.
  
• Month-end close drags out while teams manually stitch together positions.
  
• Cash forecasts are built on stale inputs that everyone knows are wrong, but no one has time to fix.

The result? Finance teams spend 15-30 hours a week doing work that adds zero strategic value. A recent study pegged the cost of manual finance work at $7.8B annually in the U.S. alone. Again, that’s not just inefficiency - it’s a systemic tax on the profession.

The Human Toll

There’s another cost, less visible on the P&L: burnout.

Treasury managers and controllers don’t leave jobs because they dislike finance. They leave because they’re treated like data clerks - spending their nights wrangling reconciliations when they should be advising on capital strategy.

Treasury should be a strategic partner to the business, not a back-office function. But as long as workflows are stuck in spreadsheets, that partnership never materializes.

Why This Problem Is Urgent Now

For years, mid-market leaders could shrug this off. Legacy TMS platforms were built for Fortune 500 balance sheets - expensive, complex, requiring months of IT lift. For everyone else, the choice was Excel or nothing.

That excuse is gone.

APIs now connect directly to 20,000+ banks. Cloud-native platforms integrate with ERPs in days, not months. AI models tag transactions, detect anomalies, and generate forecasts without manual input.

In other words: the technical barriers that once justified manual work have collapsed. If you’re still relying on spreadsheets, it’s not because there’s no alternative. It’s because change management hasn’t caught up.

From Control to Proactivity

The most important shift isn’t automation for its own sake. It’s the move from reactive controls to proactive insight.

Manual reconciliations confirm what already happened. Automated reconciliations free teams to focus on what happens next.

• Instead of spotting anomalies after month-end, you’re alerted the moment cash positions deviate.
  
• Instead of explaining idle balances to the board, you’re acting on them before the quarter ends.
  
• Instead of guessing at cash forecasts, you’re running rolling 13-week and 12-month projections that improve with every cycle.

That’s not just efficiency. That’s credibility.

The Takeaway

Treasury teams don’t need more headcount to keep up with complexity. They need leverage.

Manual workflows burn hours, create errors, and drive talent out of the profession. Yet they persist out of habit, not necessity. The technology now exists to eliminate 80% of the manual grind. The only question is whether leaders will keep paying the hidden tax of outdated processes.

Treasury’s mandate hasn’t changed: deliver control and confidence. What’s changed is how you get there. Manual reconciliation once served that mission. Today, it undermines it.

The death of manual treasury work isn’t a prediction. It’s an overdue reality.

‍